We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LP Animals in Cosmetics Research
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2297
Description[?]:
| Cosmetic products exist and are essential in human habits. From shower gel to soap, shampoo, perfurme or make-up. Instead of prohibit animal testing for cosmetic products in a blind and fanatic ecological view of the world and society, we propose the regulation of its use to this end. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:05:49, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the LP Animals in Cosmetics Research |
| Message | Cosmetic products exist and are essential in human habits. From shower gel to soap, shampoo, perfurme or make-up. Instead of prohibit animal testing for cosmetic products in a blind and fanatic ecological view of the world and society, we propose the regulation of its use to this end. |
| Date | 01:09:28, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Green Workers Party | To | Debating the LP Animals in Cosmetics Research |
| Message | We so no reason for the pointless suffering of animals when products can be tested safely and efficiently in laboratories, on willing human subjects and inanimate objects (such as latex models.) The GWP actively opposes this attempt to legalise a form of animal cruelty. |
| Date | 01:28:45, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the LP Animals in Cosmetics Research |
| Message | The GWP leader is a fanatic. |
| Date | 01:29:22, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the LP Animals in Cosmetics Research |
| Message | Better: the GWP is a bunch of ecological fanatics who dream about saving the world from... nothing! |
| Date | 01:31:58, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the LP Animals in Cosmetics Research |
| Message | The Social Liberal Party agrees with proposal, and we wonder how this corner of Lusitanian law had escaped the mighty grip that Popular Party professional deregulators previously had on Lusitania. |
| Date | 01:34:32, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the LP Animals in Cosmetics Research |
| Message | We would like to also add our opinion that if Cosmetic testing on animals was previously illegal, it was not due to ecological fanaticism but simply a choice in policy. The SLP believes that is a bad precedent if we go around calling every different opinion, fanaticism. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 111 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 77 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
| Random quote: "The trouble with unemployment is that the minute you wake up in the morning you're on the job." - Slappy White |