We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pension Act 2074
Details
Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2075
Description[?]:
An Act to establish a compulsory public pension system as a fundamental part of the social security system, in the best interest of the citizens and so that even the poorest of citizens will be able to get a pension, with the possibility of a private pension. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:43:51, June 30, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | Well? |
Date | 15:50:15, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | What are the other options? |
Date | 15:55:14, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | We support this option. "There is a compulsory private pension system" If not enough support that, then we will support your proposal. |
Date | 16:18:19, June 30, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | Freedom Party: The current law is better than the proposal of the SDP, right? |
Date | 14:39:57, July 02, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | "There is a compulsory private pension system" We'd support that proposal as well as it would at least be an improvement. |
Date | 14:50:33, July 02, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | Why should the citizens be forced to subscribe to a pension system? |
Date | 20:34:04, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | I support a total lack of government intervention here (there's a surprise). People shouldn't be made by government to do anything with their money, nor should they be prevented from doing anything. If people want to save their extra cash for their old age then by all means they should, but they shouldn't be forced to. |
Date | 11:37:11, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | I didn't look at the current option, we would support the current state of affairs or a compulsory private pension |
Date | 16:02:22, July 03, 2005 CET | From | Humanist Socialist Party | To | Debating the Pension Act 2074 |
Message | We support this proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 240 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 185 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 72 |
Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation. |
Random quote: "The worst thing the bad guys can do is force us to doubt the good ones." - Viria Agelasta, former Selucian politician |