We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Affection Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamon Royalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2298
Description[?]:
| Currently, the police of the Commonwealth are left to their own devices to regulate 'public displays of affection', deciding which, if any, such displays violate our ban on 'sexually explicit behavour'. We believe that by defining this as simply the act of sexual intercourse, we can prevent wildly divergent definitions of what 'sexually explicit behavour' means. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:23:22, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Nuncirist Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Public Affection Freedom Act |
| Message | We oppose this bill, all sexually implicit actions should remain illegal in public. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 172 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 23 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 100 |
| Random fact: Players should not role-play characters without the consent of the owner, and if they find they have role-played the character beyond what the owner intended, they should withdraw or amend the role-play appropriately. |
| Random quote: “Tell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |