Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 4316
Next month in: 03:57:57
Server time: 16:02:02, December 11, 2017 CET
Currently online (10): beenar777 | herooftime43 | HooksMan | kj#2 | Matinarazu | MrSebafueval | Phonx29 | Sylence | thewake | wucott2 | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

Bill: Bill concerning the defence of the nation (second try)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2297

Description[?]:

We should take certain meassures into account regarding the defence of our nation. These are some of these and should be considered by the parliament with serious thoughts on the defence of our borders and the protectin of our population.

1: We should have our soldiers focused on military warfare and emergency aid. Not creating a state sponsored dating service. Therefore there is no need to have marked people whether they belong to different sexual directions. The HHP believe that most of the people this law will affect is pleased that they will not be forced to tell anything about their private life.

2: We see no need to follow international law when the hobrazian law apply for these situations. Prisoners of war should be treated according to the laws of Hobrazia. If we are the captor power and we provide facilities etc. for the prisoners, it should be our own law that decide how to treat prisoners of war.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:53:27, October 10, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Bill concerning the defence of the nation (second try)
MessageThese measures are just ridiculous.

Date14:33:47, October 11, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning the defence of the nation (second try)
Message"We should have our soldiers focused on military warfare and emergency aid. Not creating a state sponsored dating service. " - Are we the only ones to spot a gigantic flaw in this reasoning? Currently both male and female soldiers work together at all levels, but this causes no problems with operational effectiveness, so why would homosexuals cause any problems?

Date14:36:33, October 11, 2006 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning the defence of the nation (second try)
MessageWe should not ask people about their sexual orientation. This is the purpose of this bill.

Date18:38:00, October 11, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Bill concerning the defence of the nation (second try)
MessageAnd yet they would not be allowed to be openly homosexual yet a colleague can be openly hetrosexual. Currently they are not forced to tell anything about their sexual preferences but they may, should they wish, be open about them to colleagues. This bill does not allow them to do that and restricts the rights of homosexuals over hetrosexuals.

Date15:32:06, October 12, 2006 CET
FromHSP (Hobrazian Socialist Party)
ToDebating the Bill concerning the defence of the nation (second try)
MessageYou should at least split the bills in case anyone wants to support you. I know I cant one either count.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 71

no
     

Total Seats: 304

abstain
 

Total Seats: 25


Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side).

Random quote: "Politics is the system of depriving the proletariat of their power." � Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66