We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Nation Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2300
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Keymon Defence Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:22:22, October 12, 2006 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement |
Message | I don't like this treaty. I think it is heavily favour them and I believe the millitary aid should be given only if we want to give it. Ratifi this mean we can't consider the situation first. |
Date | 18:43:32, October 12, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement |
Message | "IV) All signatory nations of this treaty do hereby agree, if such aid is given, to work under the supervision of the Director General of Keymon and not contradict policy directives of the Director General" It does give us a coice, it states 'if such aid is given'. |
Date | 13:25:05, October 13, 2006 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement |
Message | "All signatory nations of this treaty do hereby agree to come to the aid of Keymon through military action if such neutrality is compromised." Doesn't this phrase mean we have no choice ? |
Date | 14:33:24, October 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement |
Message | That comment is cancelled by the word 'if'. |
Date | 14:52:05, October 17, 2006 CET | From | Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry' | To | Debating the Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement |
Message | I agree the "if" is more of a "when" in this treaty, but if we find the conditions objectionable, that'll be when we leave it. |
Date | 15:01:45, October 17, 2006 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Keymon Defence Agreement |
Message | OK I understand it now ,thanks |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 128 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
Random quote: "Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools." - Napoleon Bonaparte |