We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP Structure of the Executive Branch
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2298
Description[?]:
| It is our goal to restore the Lusitanian secular constitutional monarchy and give back to the Royal House its legitimate right to represent the nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:32:59, October 12, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the CP Structure of the Executive Branch |
| Message | While we do not feel that the notion of a constitutional parliamentary monarchy does not conflict at all with democracy, our view is that we most definitely prefer preserving Lusitania as a Republic. |
| Date | 00:35:55, October 12, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the CP Structure of the Executive Branch |
| Message | Já agora um à parte. Não deixa de ser curioso que o partido que mais beneficiou do Partido Popular Monárquico não ter corrido nas últimas eleições legislativas em Portugal, foi o imundo PNR. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 188 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |