Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 4456
Next month in: 00:44:31
Server time: 23:15:28, September 18, 2018 CET
Currently online (7): Alexak | Bacchus | Kathleenie | Kraiser | Napoleon BornToParty | UnionCanrillaise | Vesica5 | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abortion

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party of Telamon

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2303

Description[?]:

---

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:24:43, October 20, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Abortion
Message"Again we must oppose. Abortions are a violation of human life. Legalized in the first semester is too much in itself. God forbid the second."

-Frank Longstreet
IADP MP

Date01:10:50, October 21, 2006 CET
FromNuncirist Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Abortion
MessageWe oppose!

Date09:09:54, October 21, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Royalist Party
ToDebating the Abortion
MessageWe stand in favour of this. Life begins at the moment the child is capable surviving outside of the womb, or so we hold. We feel this is fair, and proper.

Date11:57:20, October 21, 2006 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Abortion
MessageWe are not fully convinced of the need to extend the time of legal abortions. What is you're reasoning?

Date17:33:36, October 23, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Abortion
MessageNot all women can get abortions in the first trimester.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 187

no
  

Total Seats: 114

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" – Robert Redford

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66