We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nuncirist Party of Telamon
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2306
Description[?]:
| Under the motto: "Healthy citizens is a healthy Nation!", we present the first Act of our 'free health provisions policy'. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Current: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Proposed: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:04:19, October 27, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | We can't afford this, even though I wish we could. |
| Date | 01:34:14, October 28, 2006 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | TNP will support this. |
| Date | 12:45:20, October 28, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Royalist Party | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | As much as it pains us to vote against this, we're afraid we must. The IADP is right. This just isn't economically feasible, though we certainly wish it were. |
| Date | 13:58:25, October 28, 2006 CET | From | Nuncirist Party of Telamon | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | How is this regulation not economically feasible? Is it that the Telamon National welfare has an deprivation or is it that other social provisions have priority? These are no sarcastic questions but just some wanderings we would to like see answered. |
| Date | 02:58:55, October 29, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | It's not feasible because we can't pay for everyone's medications. Those who can pay should at least partially, so that we can focus our resources on those who most need it. |
| Date | 05:43:12, October 29, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | or mayby someone just doesent want to vote yes cos hes got a grudge against the nuncirist party? |
| Date | 01:12:59, October 30, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | No. Good guess, but I vote with the Nuncos a lot on keeping our industries nationalized and what not. I just avoid voting with them when they're wrong. |
| Date | 14:14:05, October 30, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Royalist Party | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | Actually, I'd love to vote in favour of this. Even the Nuncirists get things right every now and then. But this is just too expensive, what with the naval blockade going on and all. |
| Date | 23:37:00, October 30, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the We Pay for Your Health (i) Act of 2305 |
| Message | Since the UCA will obviously oppose this, we will vote for, for the sake of our ratings. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 132 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 102 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 67 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them so what good are they?" - Ammon Hennacy |