We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union for a Responsible Republic
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2308
Description[?]:
A bill to clarify the nuclear policy of the Cildanian Republic. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:44:40, November 01, 2006 CET | From | Mutualist Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | Cannot possibly agree with this. |
Date | 23:19:14, November 01, 2006 CET | From | One Cildania Party | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | It goes without saying that I am in full support. |
Date | 04:35:05, November 02, 2006 CET | From | Divine Party of the Republic | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | We could support this if we knew that the conventional military would be bolstered |
Date | 06:50:36, November 02, 2006 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | Would an immediate 10% increase in the budget of the Defense Department be enough to win your support, DPR? |
Date | 11:01:53, November 02, 2006 CET | From | Mutualist Party of Cildania | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | An immediate 10% wow! This is after you were responsible for slashing the defence budget by around 25% |
Date | 01:16:04, November 03, 2006 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | There is room in the budget to work with now. |
Date | 09:37:30, November 03, 2006 CET | From | One Cildania Party | To | Debating the Cildanian Nuclear Policy Act, 2307 |
Message | I'm voting for this on principle, but won't be supporting your 10% increase in the budget |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 319 | |||
no | Total Seats: 106 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "The true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality." - Che Guevara |