We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Scientific Integrity
Details
Submitted by[?]: National People's Gang
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2076
Description[?]:
| Whilst appreciating medical research may sometimes require experiments involving animals, it is essential that such activity is not conducted unecessarily or by inappropriate individuals, groups or private enterprises. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Current: Animals may not be used for any research.
Proposed: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:52:40, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | We accept the request for licensing in this matter. It is contrary to our overall precepts, but we accept that there are strong arguments (that the member for Equitista really should have made) for control on this matter. |
| Date | 05:38:44, July 04, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | We support this bill. Perhaps you could put forward another proposal in this bill to ban the testing of cosmetics on animals? |
| Date | 06:08:05, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | We refer the CNT/AFL to http://aiglesrv.no-ip.info:8080/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=8580 for a total ban on cosmetic testing. |
| Date | 15:33:23, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | We fail to see any inegrity in the actions of the Equitista party. There has been for the last four months a standing moratorium on placing bills into votiing to allow early elections to be called. However acting unilaterally and with no consideration for the proceedings of the house, the Equitista party decides that it can not wait a further month. ((Do you always act this selfishly Albert?)) |
| Date | 16:28:53, July 04, 2005 CET | From |  National People's Gang | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | ((Some of us are not online as often or as long as others, Adam. We neither agreed to a moratorium nor were we aware of its existence until after this bill had been put to vote. Given the recent record of the Muppet Brothers in bringing bills to vote after short debate periods, let's just consider this one as part of the ramshackle, undebated, half-assed, shoddy style of legislative actions adopted by the twins and their bull-dozer democracy approach)) |
| Date | 16:55:45, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | ((So you were not on line when you moved this to vote? Is that what you are claiming. Or are you just stating that you simply could not be bothered to read what is happening before you acted? One is impossible, the other is selfish. Albert, you are being incredibly childish, I suppose you know that though.)) |
| Date | 22:00:57, July 04, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | It is not the job of this parliament to get involved in the soul-wringing, heart-searching whimperings of one of the parties which has just found out that it's ideology is at odds with most of the country. The full complexion of this parliament represents the will of the electorate, not one party. The rest of us feel like we have job to do and we're getting on with it. Go cry in a teacup in private. |
| Date | 23:37:05, July 04, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Scientific Integrity |
| Message | Ok. Just you are all going to have to vote on this again when it gets reset. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 352 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 98 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader |