We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Conservative Moral Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kanjoran Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2309
Description[?]:
We believe that the morality of Kanjorans shall be preserved by these measures |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Current: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Proposed: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Current: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Proposed: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relation laws are set by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:59:47, November 04, 2006 CET | From | Kanjoran Socialist Party | To | Debating the Conservative Moral Reform |
Message | What do you think AZT? This isn't extreme and is very practical. There doesn't need to be sex on television. Nudity is alright because it is just Nudity, just don't make it sexually explicit. As for sexual relations laws, let each region draft it's own laws for that. Each region knows what is best in this regard. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 16 | |
no | Total Seats: 59 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker |