Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 03:32:45
Server time: 08:27:14, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Media Content Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2076

Description[?]:

An Act to prohibit the publication of false information and hate speech.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:50:34, July 04, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageWell?

Date16:52:15, July 04, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageNo, i am for what it is currently. If the majority votes for this change, i may support it, but i believe in the sanctity of freedom of speech and i find infringements upon it from places like the EU to be undemocratic and wrong

Date18:07:48, July 04, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageOnly printing proven falsehoods should be against the law, anything less infringes on freedom of speech which all Rutanians should have.

Date18:08:50, July 04, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageFreedom of speech ends were hate speech begins.

Date18:09:04, July 04, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Media Content Act
Message*where

Date18:09:38, July 04, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageIt is not undemocratic, it's protecting the rights of minorities and other groups.

Date18:42:31, July 04, 2005 CET
FromHumanist Socialist Party
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageWe're afraid we differ from the RSDP on this one. Speech should be free; only acts should be regulated. There is no right to not be insulted.

Presumably there are already incitement to violence/murder/whatever (but not the vague "incitement to racial hatred") laws under which "dangerous" speech could be actioned anyway.

Date20:10:53, July 04, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageSpeech is free, actions are not.


A crime is a crime.

Date21:43:48, July 04, 2005 CET
FromNew Democracy
ToDebating the Media Content Act
MessageThis is against free speech. Thus, against.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 174

no
      

Total Seats: 274

abstain
  

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75