Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 01:14:10
Server time: 02:45:49, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Election Reform of 2311

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2312

Description[?]:

Return the power to the electorate!

ooc: The new rules have drug down the pace of the game to where it's almost painful. What fun is it to sit around 12 days for a new election?

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:05:19, November 07, 2006 CET
FromFirst Party Of Hobrazia
ToDebating the Election Reform of 2311
MessageWe agree to this change, the people agree as seen by the protests.

Date09:26:07, November 07, 2006 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Election Reform of 2311
MessageThis reflects the new tendency put forward by Aaron Regdal, chairman of HPP and his allies in this question. We search for a unitarist state with a strong centre. For now we will vote no.

Date09:58:38, November 07, 2006 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Election Reform of 2311
Messageooc: Who cares about a strong unitarist state when the game is no fun to play anymore? There is little that goes on; at least frequent elections keep it fresh.

Date12:12:21, November 07, 2006 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Election Reform of 2311
Messageooc: This will be changed back, but for now the situation calls for this.

Date14:44:19, November 08, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Election Reform of 2311
Messageooc: we might consider changing the time between elections back, but not the chacellor/HoG structure. As was there was little to no point in being the chancellor (except for the pretty crown). Now at least there's a reason for the election. It just adds another level of game play.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 256

no
 

Total Seats: 97

abstain
   

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "It is necessary for him who lays out a state and arranges laws for it to presuppose that all men are evil and that they are always going to act according to the wickedness of their spirits whenever they have free scope." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58