Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 03:20:31
Server time: 16:39:28, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Small steps in the right direction

Details

Submitted by[?]: Leftsocialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2314

Description[?]:

Malivia has overall been through a positive development over the last years. These proposals are respectivelye intended to bring communities together - not gating people out and stop the trade in endangered animals that is a result of the otherwise sensible policy of the moment.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:41:56, November 11, 2006 CET
FromFaithful Believers Of Malivia
ToDebating the Small steps in the right direction
MessageWe believe the actual want of our plain citizen is to be protected from violence.
Gated communities offer this security. We do believe that it is not only a physical security that our community needs but also a protected cultural identity. The gated communities provides the opportunity to protect unimpaired growth of our children, the preservation of our customs and culture, to protect our family from crime...

Date14:37:31, November 13, 2006 CET
FromLeftsocialist Party
ToDebating the Small steps in the right direction
MessageWe are not surprised that the STU are against our socially progressive and peaceloving politics - but we are of course interested in knowing what the Protectorate Party thinks of these proposals. Nevertheless we will put the bill to a vote seing it has been on the floor for quite some time.

Date15:17:34, November 13, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Small steps in the right direction
MessageWe do not support regulating the private sector in this manner. A person is permitted to control who enters their own home and we see no reason why a group of individuals cannot exercise that same control over a collection of houses and the surrounding property.

AS for the first article we feel that the more people get to experience these creatures the less of a chance they have of remaining endangered. Care must be maintained and trade regulated, however when was the last time the house cat or dog was put on the endangered list.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 89

no
 

Total Seats: 101

abstain
  

Total Seats: 5


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

Random quote: "From my point of view, the killing of another, except in defense of human life, is archistic, authoritarian, and therefore, no anarchist can commit such deeds. It is the very opposite of what anarchism stands for." - Jo Labadie

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59