We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear Weapons

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Free Reform Coalition (FRP)

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2077

Description^[?]:

A proposal to allow the development of Nuclear Weapons, if deemed necessary.

Proposal^[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.

Old value:: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.

Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.

Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	18:49:17, July 04, 2005 CET
From	Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	if we ever need to have nuclear weapons it is important that we have the technology and ability to construct them if necessary. this does not mean we have to start building nuclear weapons right away, but that we allow research to be conducted.

Date	19:16:20, July 04, 2005 CET
From	Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	Agree.

Date	19:28:53, July 04, 2005 CET
From	Protectorate Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	Agree

Date	00:14:02, July 05, 2005 CET
From	LibCom Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	We'll support this on one condition: That we annex Atol 1 and use it as a test site.

Date	01:58:35, July 05, 2005 CET
From	Protectorate Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	Tempting but too close to home for our tastes.

Date	00:36:19, July 06, 2005 CET
From	LibCom Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	Well if we're going to develop nukes, then presumably we'll need to test them somewhere. Any better suggestions as to where?

Date	20:26:35, July 06, 2005 CET
From	Radical Centrists
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	No support.

Date	11:04:23, July 07, 2005 CET
From	Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	how about in the libcom offices, no one will miss them. in any case, we're moving to vote on this. and Atol 1 will not be a test site unless you plan on declaring war.

Date	16:28:56, July 07, 2005 CET
From	LibCom Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	Ah, now your agenda becomes clear. You want to test your nukes in the LibCom offices in the heart of Syene, which would conveniently take out the whole Assembly, opening the way for Luca T Romano to return and impose a fascist dictatorship. Cunning.

Date	20:14:56, July 07, 2005 CET
From	Social Republican Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	LibCom should retire and become a comedian.. only then someone might think that he was serious,

Date	21:28:07, July 07, 2005 CET
From	Protectorate Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	We would like to announce the movement of the PP's offices to a new location in Polkana province.

Date	22:52:29, July 07, 2005 CET
From	Social Republican Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	We didn't waste money on a headquarters. Its just a small room with couches and a fridge.

Date	22:53:29, July 07, 2005 CET
From	Social Republican Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	In a local government's jurisdiction allowing us to 'relax'

Date	01:39:36, July 08, 2005 CET
From	LibCom Party
To	Debating the Nuclear Weapons
Message	I guess that explains the erratic voting patterns then.

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 48

Total Seats: 23

abstain

Total Seats: 29

Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it.

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80