We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill of Ideas
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free People Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2313
Description[?]:
| Another bill to raise my awareness to Dorvik. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Current: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Proposed: The state does not operate a pension system. Individuals must save up for retirement on their own.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Current: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Proposed: All housing is private but rent is subsidised for low-income households.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:15:18, November 12, 2006 CET | From | Green Freedom Party | To | Debating the Bill of Ideas |
| Message | We support article 2 but not article 1. Overall, we will oppose. |
| Date | 22:02:09, November 12, 2006 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Bill of Ideas |
| Message | I would vote no for sure because of article 1. |
| Date | 00:14:44, November 13, 2006 CET | From | Socialistic Left | To | Debating the Bill of Ideas |
| Message | We can not support either of these articles. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 59 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 127 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 13 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy." - Edwin W. Edwards |