Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 02:59:36
Server time: 13:00:23, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Caoimhean | dannypk19 | Dx6743 | Luzzina | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2313

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Progressive Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2313

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:17:39, November 12, 2006 CET
From Veritan Catholic Church
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2313
Messageifyou ask us, the LPP took a lot of the important posts in this cabinet even if it is just 3.

Date19:26:51, November 12, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2313
MessageWe're the most active roleplayers in the nation, plus we have a long tradition of always taking Foreign Affairs.

Date19:31:34, November 12, 2006 CET
From Veritan Catholic Church
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2313
MessageWhat a pathetic excuse. we encourage other parties to reject this proposal as it is shortchanging you. Just because they 'have a long tradition' of taking over some posts doesnt justify them always occupying it, even if they have fewer seats.

Date19:44:31, November 12, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2313
MessageLook, no-one has exactly cared before, and no-one does at the moment. There's a reason we take Foreign Affairs, and it's because we maintain the roleplaying required for the role. The KDL have a handful of posts, the KLDP have yet to do anything and the KPF have never expressed any objections to the LPP taking the role.

Date21:13:14, November 12, 2006 CET
FromKirlawan Popular Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2313
MessageHey, god-botherers! Stop trying to split our cosy liberal / left wing conspiracy (oops - 'coalition').

The KPF will support this coalition as it maintains a majority over the Fascists and their sympathisers. We have always recognised that this country's people are opposed to social conservatism, and so while we can wee why you are aggrieved at being excluded, the people would not support a coalition between our parties

Date16:04:22, November 13, 2006 CET
From Veritan Catholic Church
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2313
MessageWe are not "aggrieved at being excluded" we're simply showing you that you can rise above what one party dictates you can have in the cabinet. if you are satisfied with 2nd rate status then thats your business

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 429

no
   

Total Seats: 318

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other in order that the people may require a leader." - Plato

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62