Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5470
Next month in: 03:10:37
Server time: 00:49:22, April 17, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Dx6743 | JourneyKun | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Blobs

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2076

Description[?]:

We propose an alternative cabinet without the EUP. This is a statement against the EUP's recent combination of power and lack of activity.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:10:53, July 04, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageWe'll now happily support this.

Date23:19:53, July 04, 2005 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageYou can go ahead an change the bill title to "Every Party in the Entire Freaking Parliament Except for the CSP and an Inactive Party Cabinet Proposal." That would work too ;)

Date23:29:02, July 04, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageNot bitter, are you ;)

Date00:05:12, July 05, 2005 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageNot really; it's a game and games are meant to be fun. It does seem a bit ridiculous though.

Date01:53:31, July 05, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Liberal Party
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageWe'll accept this as, to be honest, we didn't even expect to be included!

Date14:14:32, July 05, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageWe'll support this. It's a broad representation of parties.

Date18:51:52, July 05, 2005 CET
FromLeft Communist Party
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageWe do not accept this proposal.

Date18:59:24, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageSince we have nough parties there to seemingly eclipse the majority of the EUP, and recognising that the EUP has been mostly inactive, I say we move this proposal to a vote.

Date19:04:01, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageI'm considering that as a pure act of rebellion. Or maybe I should create one with every party except the EUP to make that point clearer.

Date19:06:38, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageI think this one is fair enough, to be honest. We don't want to waste more time with Cabinet proposals. There are enough collective seats here to win I think.

Date19:14:33, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageIt all depends on the early election bill...

Date19:20:02, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageThat seems to be at a standstill, right now.

I urge the UB to quickly move this to a vote.

Date19:20:43, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageLet's see what happens now.

Date19:23:55, July 05, 2005 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageEven if this passes it still might be prudent to introduce the early elections bill anyway...

Date19:25:31, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageI agree with that. Perhaps it would be a good idea to think of this as a statement agains the EUP's inactivity.

Date19:26:45, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageAnd I've changed the description to include that.

Date19:41:27, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageLet's see what happens now.

Date19:42:11, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageLet's see what happens now.

Date19:42:30, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageSorry about the double post.

Date19:49:21, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageAnd now for the SDLP to come online...

Date22:18:12, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageIt looks like the SDLP are the Kingmakers...

Date22:35:00, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageThe early election bill is probably going to kick this to the debate stage. It would still be a victory of the smaller parties if we got enough for this to pass though. I wonder what the cabinet's after the election will look like.

Date22:43:38, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Movement
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageIt will be very interesting.

Times like this you wish the SDLP were online to decide it..

Date22:59:54, July 05, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Revised United Blobs Cabinet Proposal without EUP
MessageThat's the trouble when you've no idea what time zone people are in.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 192

no
  

Total Seats: 172

abstain
  

Total Seats: 27


Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

Random quote: "We here thank those in Deltaria who put [Zardic spy Mona Rivet] to justice in the most humane way possible. With bullets." - Sergio Rodriguez, former Egelian journalist

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 90