We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Malivian sustainability
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leftsocialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2314
Description[?]:
| We must secure the sustainable growth in Malivia and therefor we need to push for som more governmental regulation. If we don't do it now it may be too late. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of endangered animals.
Old value:: Everyone may keep endangered animals, but the trade in, and the ownership of, endangered animals is strictly regulated by the government to prevent their extinction in the wild.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Proposed: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Everyone may keep exotic animals, but the trade in exotic animals is regulated by the government.
Current: Keeping exotic animals is forbidden.
Proposed: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Current: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:30:07, November 14, 2006 CET | From | Leftsocialist Party | To | Debating the Malivian sustainability |
| Message | What does the Protectorate party think of our proposals? |
| Date | 16:56:53, November 14, 2006 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Malivian sustainability |
| Message | We have previously stated our opinion on the first two. Feeling that the more people have access to wildlife, the less likely these animals would become endangered. Provided care is taken to prevent abuse or endangering the public. On the third article, we feel that local control impowers the population to take an interest in their resources to protect their jobs and environment. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 89 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 101 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 5 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy |