We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Policy Discussion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partisans And Artisans League
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2112
Description[?]:
| This is another bill that won't be voted on because I'm using it more like a forum. The topic being how could we encourage good relations with our neighbours, The Commonwealth of Luthori and Most Serene Republic of Darnussia. If that is, you want to have a peaceful border... This bill is just for the record. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:07:36, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Customs free trade is always a good start... |
| Date | 12:07:45, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Just a though |
| Date | 12:08:35, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Its got to be said that with the new map we have the prettiest country in the world. |
| Date | 21:12:39, July 05, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Here! Here! Who knew Bailon was a set of three islands? (I don't think it was before). I'll have a think about this, my mind's currently drawing a blank and hopefully get back to you. |
| Date | 00:31:35, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | alliances/pacts of hatred? |
| Date | 00:31:43, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | joking |
| Date | 00:45:13, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | I think it would add whole new element for the game if we as a country started getting involved internationally and maybe started a thread in the forum. Like the news or something. The Kundrati Union has one for example and it gives the game more interesting. |
| Date | 02:52:43, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | I agree with PAAL. We should get involved on the international scene and get ourselves recognized. Darnussia would seem to be a natural ally, as we are the only two nations in the immediate region that hold island nations, and thus would be most interested in having a large navy and merchant marine. We also might wish to consider having hostile relations with other nations, such as Luthori. OOCly, I think ti would be fun, ICly the FBP would oppose the war if there is a chance of a peaceful resolution (Baring a 20 on my result roll), but should war become obviously inevitable, or happen anyway, the FBP will back it to the hilt and to the end. |
| Date | 14:22:36, July 08, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | one note we do actually have a news thread in the forum it's just no-one's updated it in about two months. |
| Date | 18:35:49, July 11, 2005 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | We must eliminate the foriegn menace! |
| Date | 12:39:42, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | I think we should give an offer of an alliance to either the Federated States of Rutania or The Most Serene Republic of Darnussia. |
| Date | 12:52:02, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | I know we could have an western or southern alliance of the nations in our continent ( which I don't know the name of) |
| Date | 14:08:01, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Artania I think... |
| Date | 21:36:58, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Free trade is nice |
| Date | 00:19:35, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Free trade is nice... thats the first time I've agreed with you. Although a government must allow itself to hold a protectionist laws if the need arose. |
| Date | 01:27:17, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | So, no comments about having a standing hostile relationship? :( |
| Date | 17:56:06, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | (I'm cool with it OOC, though ICly we will be peacemongering) |
| Date | 12:49:14, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | One thing we all need to consider is that the world obviously isn't a disc so we really are quite close to Eastern Seleya and will be very close to the one remaining unnamed region in Makon. If you don't know the continent names here they are - http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=967&mforum=particracy The most interesting developement is that if you think about the world as round, we are very close to the conflict between Kalistan and Gaduridos. |
| Date | 13:52:46, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | I think we should have the South Artanian Naval Training Agreement or SANTA for short, between Darnussia ourselves (and maybe more) in which the two (+) navies do joint training exercise, like many countries do. |
| Date | 13:53:06, July 17, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Can I suggest this to them? |
| Date | 23:09:51, July 18, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Considering our proximity to them and the fact that we are both nations with control of the islands on this side of Artania it would be a good idea to encourage peace between us and them. |
| Date | 19:08:17, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Could this bill be renamed "Foreign Policy Discussion"? I keep getting confused about the nature of this topic. |
| Date | 00:20:40, July 24, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | ... or not. |
| Date | 00:00:04, July 26, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | oh yeah sorry |
| Date | 14:47:48, July 29, 2005 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | Fair trade, not free trade~! |
| Date | 15:28:47, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | OOC: If I had not seen the forums I'd imagine there has been awfully little foreign policy discussion since I left temporarily. |
| Date | 19:31:11, August 23, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | This bill means nothing - its just a record of comments. |
| Date | 00:04:37, September 16, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | I am voting no, because I am the minister and will deal with issues like this. |
| Date | 00:07:25, September 16, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Discussion |
| Message | You weren't when it was made. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 148 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 252 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky |