Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 00:25:34
Server time: 11:34:25, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Brazil25 | FireboyUK | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sodomy Devolution

Details

Submitted by[?]: Green Freedom Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2315

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:19:44, November 16, 2006 CET
From People's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Sodomy Devolution
MessageSo does this mean youre against gay marriage/relations? The only reason that youd propose this bill is to take a baby step toward abolishing gay sex (hence the title). And why should two people in one part of the country be able to have sexual relations while another couple in the next county cannot? If this bill passes, it will be like drinking laws in the were in the ficticious nation of America; except people would cross over the county line to have sex instead of drink alcohol.

Date02:35:08, November 16, 2006 CET
From Green Freedom Party
ToDebating the Sodomy Devolution
MessageThe GFP is not opposed to gay marriage. However, we are strongly devolutionist, and recognize that some of the more religious counties (like Miktar, for example) would like to prevent homosexuality. The loss of population/economy would be that region's, as those who do wish to engage in these acts would simply relocate to a more friendly region.
Although it may seem we are advocating lack of choice, we are really doing just the opposite - giving the people in each region the choice.

Date03:49:03, November 16, 2006 CET
From People's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Sodomy Devolution
MessageThe PPP understands your reasoning, but given our stance on morality and the freedom to choose and express ones own sexual preferences gives us no choice but to vote 'no' to this bill.

Date04:12:58, November 16, 2006 CET
From People's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Sodomy Devolution
Messagelucky for you its only ten votes..... for now

Date01:09:31, November 17, 2006 CET
From People's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Sodomy Devolution
Messageits the same 2 votes once again!

Date01:27:03, November 17, 2006 CET
From Green Freedom Party
ToDebating the Sodomy Devolution
MessageI know! It seams the SA and I have more in common than we thought... still only a 38% voting record, though.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 94

no
    

Total Seats: 92

abstain
  

Total Seats: 13


Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements.

Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52