We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Commanding heights bill.
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2316
Description[?]:
Ensuring a mixed economy. We would like to ensure that vital public services are conducted by the state. Energy companies and alike, will be controlled by an "industry director", responsible for its day to day running. the appointment shall be made and the Great Chieftain for each industry brought under state control. Industried like energy are very profitable. we feel that such profits could be used to benefit the public. The passing of this bill also enact the creation of an independant department of experts in the area of each industry. Their job to investigate ways in which the state owned industries service can be improved and recommend them to the trade and industry minister, on a basis dictated by that minister. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Current: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Proposed: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private, unregulated companies but subsidies are given to those on a low income.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:30:21, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | No and no and no. |
Date | 01:32:58, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | We also oppose all three articles; although we might support some in-between-solution |
Date | 13:59:31, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | Proposal 1: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company. Proposal 2: The national grid is fully owned by the State. Proposal 3: Energy is provided by nationalised companies. We though it over, checked the possible options, and we're willing to support the second article, but we'll keep opposing the first one, and we're still in doubt about the last one |
Date | 14:07:03, November 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | And we'll oppose the compromise offered by the GLDS for the people do not want things nationalized. |
Date | 19:31:31, November 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | .ha despite your generalisations not everyone is the same. show me proof that the people don't want nationalisation. Opinions show they are much more opinionated on other issues and don't have the stronges feelings on this issue. |
Date | 15:02:30, November 18, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | We're going to oppose this matter. It is a known fact that opinion polls do want power plants to continue to be runned by private individuals as well as the power grid. One has to go back and look through all the opinion polls dealing with this issue. |
Date | 00:18:47, November 19, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Commanding heights bill. |
Message | GLDS. shall propose article 2 on its own and meet that compromise. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 103 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 392 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda against democracy." - Alex Carey |