We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 2076
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2076
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Rutania Socialist Green Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:13:16, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2076 |
| Message | Move to pass to clear out the current cabiniet (in effect voiding it) to make the issue a tad bit more pressing. I think that it is fair to say that the current cabinet is lame-duck and does not represent the parties at large, and to prevent the cabinet members from pulling rank because of this, I suggest the above as a pro-tempore cabinet (seeing as the SGP is a zero-seat party, they can't affect the voting and thus can't obstruct us like the current cabinet can) |
| Date | 09:42:02, July 06, 2005 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2076 |
| Message | I'm not so sure about this, this would place a lot of power in the hands of a party that is not yet represented in the Federal Parliament... |
| Date | 14:14:47, July 06, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2076 |
| Message | Indeed. |
| Date | 18:36:51, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2076 |
| Message | He's inactive, no power at all... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 42 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 340 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 115 |
| Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted. |
| Random quote: "The right to suffer is one of the joys of a free economy." - Howard Pyle (commenting on unemployment in Detroit) |