Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 01:48:06
Server time: 06:11:53, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons

Details

Submitted by[?]: Leviathan Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2323

Description[?]:

There is never any cause for the use of development of chemical and biological weapons. Our government will have no moral footing as long as we reserve the use or stockpiling of these heinous weapons.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:17:45, November 30, 2006 CET
FromFaithful Believers Of Malivia
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageAs God gave us the ability to fabricate these weapons, so it is his will that we use these weapons for our well-being and progress.
In fact, this means deterrence and the strategical usage of them.

Date03:24:40, November 30, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageWe support the second article however feel that by researching the technology we also research effective countermeasures to these threats.

Date10:06:12, November 30, 2006 CET
FromLeviathan Party
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageThe challenge with research is that it requires we guard the facilities doing that research. Though we may never use chemical or biological weapons, each stockpile we use to develop countermeasures is a stockpile of weapons waiting to be stolen and used against us. Given the likelihood of being attacked with chemical or biological weapons, this seems an unnecessary risk.

Date21:47:35, November 30, 2006 CET
FromLeftsocialist Party
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageIf a international agreement could be reached then we would support the bill but at the moment we need to reserve all options in the defence of Malivia.

Date15:50:07, December 01, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageWe feel that there is a very real risk of chemical or biological attack given the current international climate. Thus we should continue to develop effective counter measures. Should the international arena settle to a peaceful state or we are convinced that the internal threat is larger then an external threat we would support discontinuing our research. Until such time we do not support the first article.

Date07:14:57, December 02, 2006 CET
FromLeviathan Party
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageThis is one issue we do not feel there can be compromise on. Someone must set an example for the world, and we see no better nation to do so then our own.

Date02:07:42, December 03, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Ban Chemical and Biological Weapons
MessageNot at this time but perhaps soon.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 45

no
  

Total Seats: 96

abstain
 

Total Seats: 54


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "I don't believe you need to be bitch to succeed in business" - Lucinda Redwood, former Luthorian-Dorvish businesswoman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68