We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Notice: Undefined index: EXECUTIVE_LEADER in /var/www/vhosts/particracy.net/subdomains/classic/httpdocs/viewbill.php on line 234
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2035
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2037
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2035 |
| Message | I would have liked to see more attempts to bring the parties together, but if the two labor parties feel the need to monopolize the cabinetry, so be it. I will be voting 'no', and not just for traditional reasons. |
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2035 |
| Message | Alan Sharkey: A strong Government and a strong opposition is what is needed for an effective parliament. If we were to just incorporate most parties into the Government, who would act as the check, the balance to the Government? |
| Date | not recorded | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2035 |
| Message | I'm not saying that we should merge, i'm saying that you should not shut out half the country from the cabinet |
| Date | not recorded | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2035 |
| Message | The two largest parties have control of the cabinet... While we aren't exactly pleased with this arrangement, the winners make the rules. We will accept this cabinet if needed to strengthen our government. |
| Date | not recorded | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2035 |
| Message | i guess it's inevitable, so i'm just going to say 'yes' and get it off the table |
| Date | not recorded | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2035 |
| Message | Congrats to the victor's. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 34 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 6 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "If democracy is ever to be threatened, it will not be by revolutionary groups burning government offices and occupying the broadcasting and newspaper offices of the world. It will come from disenchantment, cynicism and despair caused by the realization that the New World Order means we are all to be managed and not represented." - Tony Benn |