We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Malivian Neutrality
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leviathan Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2327
Description[?]:
| A proposal by the FM for the official pronouncement of Malivian neutrality. "The Most Serene Commonwealth of Malivia does hereby declare itself a neutral country. 1) The government of Malivia will not take part in any armed conflict between nations or factions, whether declared or undeclared. 2) The government of Malivia will keep its borders open to refugees of all nations, without respect to political position or circumstance." |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:17:00, December 08, 2006 CET | From | Leviathan Party | To | Debating the Malivian Neutrality |
| Message | Minister Polyov addresses the jawatankuasa. 'Though we have yet to come to an agreement on the exact terms and position we have regarding the Deltarians, the Foreign Ministry believes it is imperative we have an official declaration of neutrality from the government. If we are about to begin taking in refugess from a nation that shoots the families of refugees, we should not be surprised if we soon find ourselves the target of criticism and condemnation. We cannot expect people forced from their homes by the most base forms of tyranny to stand idly by and wait for this storm to pass, and while law enforcement can help limit the incidence of criminal conspiracy within Malivia, it cannot eliminate it. We will soon, I fear, find ourselves accused of harboring terrorists and rebels, regardless of whether those accusations are true. 'An official declaration of neutrality in all armed conflicts, and a pledge to keep borders open to all refugees regardless of nationality, is absolutely necessary.' |
| Date | 18:37:10, December 09, 2006 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Malivian Neutrality |
| Message | We support this move. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader |