We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ban Cosmetic Testing on Animals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Leviathan Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2327
Description[?]:
Animal testing should be allowed only in circumstances where there are no alternatives AND the need for the research is great. Neither applies in the case of cosmetic companies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:34:00, December 09, 2006 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Ban Cosmetic Testing on Animals |
Message | agree. |
Date | 09:36:50, December 10, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Ban Cosmetic Testing on Animals |
Message | No. While the MDP feels personally opposed to using animals for testing....it does have a benefit. Granted, testing on animals may be inhumane and cruel, but so is eating them, and the vast majority of Malivians are not vegetarians. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 99 | |||
no | Total Seats: 49 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason." - Abraham Joshua Heschel |