We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Trade Union protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2328
Description[?]:
Protecting the rights of trade unions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The workers' right to strike.
Old value:: All workers have the right to strike but certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society have to ensure a minimal service.
Current: All workers have the right to strike but certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society have to ensure a minimal service.
Proposed: All workers have the right to strike.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:35:24, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Clyrvská Dynastia | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | I was hounded for putting things straight to vote, why can the vag commies do it? |
Date | 15:35:32, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | We oppose the idea of the HPP and their idea that workers do not have the right to strike. |
Date | 15:44:24, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | Because it is not vague. It is protecting the rights of trade unions. |
Date | 16:14:23, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | Well, workers have the right to strike. Just those working in neccesary service organs or supply sectors are not, as the country must function even though we are in difficult situations. Also people accepted this as they knew the rules when choosing their path in life. Furthermore, when you proclaim that this is a vote for more power to the trade unions, we would say that it is way to much power to the trade unions, as they can if this passes declare strike among workers critical to society and stop the nation from running. The power should always be with the politicians (legitimate elected by the people) and not the trade unions. We though support trade unions as our nation is on some issues under the constraints of capitalism. |
Date | 19:42:05, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Clyrvská Dynastia | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | MSPH - I didn't call you vague. |
Date | 19:51:21, December 11, 2006 CET | From | Marxist-Socialist Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | I am the commies. |
Date | 09:20:03, December 12, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Trade Union protection Act |
Message | Actually, I WILL complain about things being sent straight to vote! Don't do it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 100 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 300 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Prejudices subsist in people's imagination long after they have been destroyed by their experience." - Ernest Dimnet |