Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 00:44:11
Server time: 03:15:48, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Beluzia Could Be Better Part V

Details

Submitted by[?]: LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2328

Description[?]:

And with our leadership and through our various measures we will make it so.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:40:06, December 13, 2006 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Beluzia Could Be Better Part V
MessageFunny TSP, I though you were against the death penalty

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 356

no
   

Total Seats: 394

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 42