Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 01:27:27
Server time: 10:32:32, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Safety From Wild Animals Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Populist Social Democrats

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2328

Description[?]:

Whereas, current law allows people to keep any animal as a pet, regardless of its danger to the public or the well-being of the pet,

We hereby propose that precautions must be taken for the public safety.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:56:30, December 12, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Safety From Wild Animals Act
MessageWe must oppose this well intentioned bill, as it would be too restrictive on the rights of those pet owners who are completly responsible in their stewardship of our wild cousins.

Date22:35:43, December 12, 2006 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the Safety From Wild Animals Act
MessageWe held off on this bill to see if compromise was possible.

While we would prefer to ban the ownership of dangerous wild animals outright, we shall change the bill to simply require precautions against escape to be taken.

Date15:27:13, December 13, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Safety From Wild Animals Act
MessageWith that change, we can support this measure

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 300

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 51


    Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

    Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49