We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Park System Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2078
Description[?]:
| We should think more about future generations and give them a chance to see flora and fauna in good shape! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government does not have a national park system policy.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government designates ecological preservation zones but does not fund their oversight.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:15:04, July 08, 2005 CET | From | Committee for Public Salvation | To | Debating the National Park System Act |
| Message | Oddly enoug, we don't have much in the way of local government, so its difficult to devolve anything.. |
| Date | 19:49:43, July 08, 2005 CET | From | Committee for Public Salvation | To | Debating the National Park System Act |
| Message | Hmmm. Yes, more sensible this way. However,we do think that a bit of funding for oversight would increase Safety. |
| Date | 21:14:04, July 08, 2005 CET | From | Capitalist Party | To | Debating the National Park System Act |
| Message | We strongly support |
| Date | 21:38:21, July 08, 2005 CET | From | Committee for Public Salvation | To | Debating the National Park System Act |
| Message | We reserve the right to introduce oversight later. It is a step forward. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 335 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 220 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "There is only one difference between dictatorship and democracy. In democracy, you vote and then take orders; in dictatorship you don't waste time voting." - Joseph Stalin |