We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Tech Protection Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2333
Description[?]:
| TBA |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Protection of original works of technology and arts.
Old value:: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Current: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Proposed: Works of techology and art have limited copy protection.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:25:37, December 18, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | . oh no. this gets rid of the level playing field in business. |
| Date | 15:06:42, December 18, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | We shall support. |
| Date | 16:46:43, December 18, 2006 CET | From | Centrica | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | This act does not have our support. |
| Date | 23:22:45, December 19, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | And prey tell does this get rid of a level playing field? And keep it short for I hate reading long rants. |
| Date | 14:12:38, December 20, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | Because big companies can just copy off the little guys ideas by producing similar ideas, but because its not just the same as limited copyright law protects they can do this. What about the little guywho doesn't stand a chance against big business? why do we need to follow this policy that could contribute towards the extermination of the future generations of rising entrepreneurs |
| Date | 18:15:58, December 20, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | We are not calling for an end to all copy right protection. Just limited protection. We can still protect the little man with this legislation. |
| Date | 20:45:44, December 21, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tech Protection Reform Act |
| Message | it is barely protection. this reduces the protection the little man/woman(not talking about dwarfs), there is no doubt about that, why steal the xurrent protection he/she has from big business? why should the council support this bill? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 230 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 265 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "The problem is big government. If whoever controls government can impose his way upon you, you have to fight constantly to prevent the control from being harmful. With small, limited government, it doesn't much matter who controls it, because it can't do you much harm." - Harry Browne |