We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Local Forest Protection Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Populist Social Democrats
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2335
Description[?]:
| Whereas, We do not believe national restrictions are needed on forest protection, given that replanting must occur, but Whereas, We believe that a local or prefecturial government should have the ability to choose to have its forests preserved, if it is willing to take the economic hit that would come with such a policy, and Whereas, We feel confident that there will be areas of the nation in which logging is permitted with little if any restriction, based on the economic incentive to do so, We hereby propose to give local governments the power, if they choose to use it, to regulate logging. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government has no policy on forest protection.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 20 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 55 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 124 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "Dictators ride to and fro upon tigers which they dare not dismount. And the tigers are getting hungry." - Winston Churchill |