We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet proposals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Redneck Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2339
Description[?]:
Due to a recent poll, it is time to introdue a bill the RnP has long supported. And if you look at the numbers, a vote against this, is a vote against every voting citizen.. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:39:52, January 02, 2007 CET | From | Spiritualists' National Union | To | Debating the Cabinet proposals |
Message | I am curious as to what the effect of passing this Bill would be. Luthori's Head of State is hereditary, and not controlled by any of the parties. In view of this, how would Cabinets be proposed? |
Date | 00:11:42, January 03, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet proposals |
Message | I can answer this question without the damage that passing this bill would cause. The effect would be that no cabinets would be proposed. Even if ministers resigned and parties went inactive they would never be replaced. |
Date | 00:12:48, January 03, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet proposals |
Message | And why would the Rednecks want to keep the CURRENT cabinet indefinitely? At least wait until WE control the cabinet before proposing a law like this!!! |
Date | 01:01:14, January 03, 2007 CET | From | Spiritualists' National Union | To | Debating the Cabinet proposals |
Message | In view of this explanation, our party will gentlemanly resist the temptation to switch its vote to a "yes" :-) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 39 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 61 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
Random quote: "The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming." - Kirill Kondratyev |