Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 00:46:24
Server time: 11:13:35, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | Aren | itsjustgav | Nileowen_Kir | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 2080

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2082

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:14:22, July 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
Messagewell, that's just basic proposal, if you are included and don't agree, propose something else, if you have preference for some ministries. I guess 4+3+3 is just model.

Date00:17:51, July 14, 2005 CET
FromWorkers Democratic Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageThat's quite an ideological mix you got there

Date00:21:25, July 14, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageCan I trade the foreign affairs with something else? Anything else?

I admit that I don't know this business enough to be effective in that position.

Date00:22:43, July 14, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageWDU: that's definitely true. but since there isn't really a tradition of coalition agreements, there isn't some grey compromise that will define policy in this country.

Date03:55:00, July 14, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageGive the WDU foreign affairs if he wants it. This way it can be 3-3-3-`

Date03:55:06, July 14, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
Message* 3-3-3-1

Date05:26:38, July 14, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
Message* 3-3-3-1

Date11:16:24, July 14, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageIf we're going to search outside the coalition, then I'd rather have the FCP have it. They are experienced in this department.

Date12:44:41, July 14, 2005 CET
FromWorkers Democratic Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageI wouldn't be willing to serve in a cabinet with the SCP, thanks for the thought though FP

Date02:18:54, July 15, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageSee the most recent cabinet proposal.

Date18:56:10, July 17, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2080
MessageLet's vote, then.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 138

no
   

Total Seats: 77

abstain
    

Total Seats: 185


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "All within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state." - Benito Mussolini

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62