Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:22:24
Server time: 17:37:35, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): itsjustgav | lulus | Moderation | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: PCA bill - 'Unshackling the Media' 1

Details

Submitted by[?]: Permissive Social Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2341

Description[?]:

A free flow of information is necessary for any democracy. We propose the following.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:43:39, January 06, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the PCA bill - 'Unshackling the Media' 1
MessageThe LITP would oppose this Bill.

Date21:08:37, January 06, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the PCA bill - 'Unshackling the Media' 1
MessageWe see no way in which it shackles the media for there to be non-profit groups running some televsion stations, but private entities free to run their own.

We would have a hard choice on how to vote on the other two articles, as the desires of our constituency would conflict with the desires of most in our caucus for some level of moderation. We would probably be willing to vote in favor of a bill that let all pornography on television if the hours were to remain limited, and even possibly the converse, of keeping it to soft core but removing the hourly restriction; but we would have a problem with the passage of both proposals, with unlimited violent pornography all day.

Date22:07:13, January 06, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the PCA bill - 'Unshackling the Media' 1
MessageWe feel responsibility for moderating what children see on TV rests solely with the parents. We also recognise that no one is forced to watch TV.

Date22:35:24, January 06, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the PCA bill - 'Unshackling the Media' 1
MessageWe might buy that argument if we weren't speaking of violent pornography.

Violent pornography depicts what appears to be rape. We believe it might encourage rape. We do not accept the claims some make that all pornography does, as any that is merely arousing but not violent might promote sex (which we have no problem with) but not rape.

If the idea were merely to let soft-core pornography on television all day long, and Article 1 were not in the bill, we could probably vote in favor of the proposal and allow parents to monitor what their children watch. The same would probably be true with all pornography but only late at night. However, we cannot support combining the two.

As it stands we cannot vote for it.

Date10:47:31, January 07, 2007 CET
FromPermissive Social Union
ToDebating the PCA bill - 'Unshackling the Media' 1
MessageIn the interests of raising the profile of our somewhat new party, we bring this to the vote regardless.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 138

abstain
 

Total Seats: 61


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "When strangers start acting like neighbors, communities are reinvigorated." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66