We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Non-Intervention in the Market Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2083
Description[?]:
| Changes to the economy to open up the markets and allow free trade. The government should not prop up and sustain inefficient and bad businesses, the private sector will run them efficiently and profitably if there is sufficient demand. If the industry is strategic/important then there will be demand. This does not stop the government from buying from the private companies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:58:26, July 14, 2005 CET | From |  Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Non-Intervention in the Market Act |
| Message | I am willing to compromise and have this option "The government subsidizes private enterprises that face bankruptcy." |
| Date | 21:52:35, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Non-Intervention in the Market Act |
| Message | Against! |
| Date | 12:42:42, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Non-Intervention in the Market Act |
| Message | This is fraud! Higher education and industries in one bill! We, ALF, call all social-oriented parties to vote against this counter-revolutionary bill! |
| Date | 23:27:18, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Non-Intervention in the Market Act |
| Message | Oh no, god forbid we stop a revolution that seeks to overthrow our fair parliamentary democracy |
| Date | 08:56:10, July 20, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the Non-Intervention in the Market Act |
| Message | You are funny - both of my new "silent " mates here are making me laugh a lot to myself ... where have they gone!? Some more lessons dear mates ... from who wants to offer them, not from who tells you quick ... We have two similar alternatives: To Subsidize ... and To Nationalize ... these are doing the same job, but "under different leading parties" ... It is publicly forbidden to "nationalize" in Capitalist countries ... and it is politically impossible to find a rich cashful bank to "subsidize" in Communist countries ... in "so called" marginal democratic / liberation / freedom / republican front countries it is inopportunated to have another kind of economy than the "free market with no state intervention in economy" proposed here by the Capitalist Party, but the subsidize or nationalize waste of authority is here disimulated behind huge demands of goods from the private industries, artificially created by the state and the parties in government ... In fact we have three alternatives: one for the Communist parties and countries (to nationalize) ... one for the Capitalist parties and countries (to subsidize) ... and one for the underdeveloped, third economic world, poor countries like in Africa (to demand products goods from the private industries)- I said "like in Africa" though Romania, my real life country, is doing the same politics after 1989. What is the reason to discuss the retreats of the state from the economy? ... because the hope of good leaders - disappeared today - is to have a better economy ran by its own pieces, without the intervention of the state ... the higher the cultural level gets in a country, the higher gets the chances to run the economy with its private owners, meantime becoming more and more responsible for their actions in economy, able to do the job smarter than the state personnel who does not count same number of members as industry ... The gain is called ... or the responsible industries game is called AREAS - as the most stupid people at their time the citizens from USA managed to have their great members burried at Arlington - so called AREA 51 is somewhere else too The AREAS of responsability are extended while before the industries rushed just for for More POWER in their own (local) region ... its kind of a needed progress ... ... so the good state leaders ACCEPT to retreat the state from the economic AREAS games if the cultural gains are more significant than the economic results achieved ... by the private owners and their teams ... But there is a place where the state should stop, the state should chose not to intervene on the market but to get it to a higher standard, will not intereven on the market but will enlarge it will not subsidize economic bankruptcies but will invets in changes of the useability of the previous investition, will not own the higher levels of demand in economy but will make the best suggestions before others can ... Actually the good leader of the state is an Intelligence higher than everyone in his state ... unbearable or not from there is the only way out of troubles or onto the next levels coming ... however the private owners are participating in conferencies and discussions like we do right here ... The problem is that the state must make his good intentions readable for guys like you who (previously) did not knew, just felt there is needed a more free economy, felt it looks good to stay and watch how the walls of the industries fall under the eyes of their owners ignorance, felt is good to believe that were is industry is intelligence too ... i am afraid that an enterpriser who does not retire before the end of his life is like any poor uneployed guy who didn't had a penny in his pocket, both starved for money ... one to have them normally, the other to have them more (in seconds and after that seconds More again) For these two guys is no Intelligence of special kind needed ... That is why the state says STRATEGIC SECTORS REMAIN UNDER STATE OWNERSHIP hidding behind the need of intervention but slightly easy and at the level of suggestions meantime ensuring the most important industries all times ... We vote NO and prefere to stay as it is the law today. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 202 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 146 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 147 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "Global warmers predict that global warming is coming, and our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not pay their salaries. It's that simple." - Kary Mullis |