We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2080
Details
Submitted by[?]: Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2081
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Free Beluzians
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Partisans And Artisans League
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Partisans And Artisans League
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Partisans And Artisans League
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Free Beluzians
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:14:35, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | At the very least the parties in the proposed government could bother to give their respective candidates names! |
| Date | 21:27:10, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | I have started to do so. Haven't finished yet. |
| Date | 21:34:40, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Anyway, it's a coalition government. The names will not show up here as the bill is simply saying which party will take which responsibility. |
| Date | 21:50:41, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | (OOC: Odd. You'd think that we give these posts names for a reason. :S Anyway, maybe when they are actually appointed.) |
| Date | 23:53:48, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Yeah I'm struggling with names as well. One was hard enough. I need comedy value. Thanks for the positions btw. |
| Date | 23:54:33, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Get this one to vote quick because we need a cabinet for the first time in about 15 years |
| Date | 00:17:47, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | No probs. I'm just waiting for the FBP to respond, if they haven't by tomorrow though I'll put it to vote. |
| Date | 00:34:59, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | k |
| Date | 00:40:12, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Hah just put it to a vote because the FBP were on then off and its late so I can't imagine they will be on again. |
| Date | 00:45:03, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Never know they might be. ;-) Hell, I'm on here again! Besides I don't know which timezone they're in. |
| Date | 00:46:54, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Suppose. I'm staying on for another 15mins and then i'm gonna watch the boxing match on channel 5. |
| Date | 00:55:05, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Sorry I was wrong about you FBP guy. What timezone are you in? Isn't it great NMRP to be in GMT central - it makes life so much simpler |
| Date | 00:55:41, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | :-) *looks triumphant* They're online! |
| Date | 00:59:25, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Heh, sorry. My internest connection goes FUP. Am drafting response. |
| Date | 01:00:23, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Quick NMRP! The fights about to start! |
| Date | 01:01:18, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Definately. No subtraction or addition. ;-) |
| Date | 01:02:19, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Definately. No subtraction or addition. ;-) |
| Date | 01:03:11, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | The Free Beluzians welcome this chance to take part of the Government of Beluzia, especially in the support Ministries of Science, Technology and Agriculture; and Health and Social Services. While we would prefer a position in a Ministry such as Justice, we fully understand that the Partisans and Artisans League is a long established participant in the Government, previously holding the office of President, and that this is the FBP's first time in the Cabinent, and thus we would obviously not recieve the Ministry of Justice. I will be giving you the candatites for the positions shortly. |
| Date | 01:03:49, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Hurrah! Going to vote. :-D |
| Date | 01:04:20, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Fight? What fight? I needed time to BS that "I have this ministry, but I want that ministry too, but I know that you won't give it to me because I'm new, so I won't raise a stink about it and comply, but I want to let you know that I want that ministry - for future reference." post. |
| Date | 01:04:40, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Remind me next time (if I ever get in again) and I'll give you Justice. |
| Date | 01:05:06, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | I haven't got candidates - can I fill i the blanks later? |
| Date | 01:06:21, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | If you live in Britain and can get channel 5 theres a boxing match on - I mentioned it earlier - sorry. |
| Date | 01:07:16, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Right bye ttyl |
| Date | 01:07:48, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Sure. I don't even know if the names'll show up later. Enjoy the fight. :-) FBP it's a boxing match being shown on channel five over here in the UK, don't ask me the specifics as I don't watch boxing.;-) |
| Date | 01:10:38, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Thats okay, I'm kinda without cable TV here in the US, so watching something over in the UK is kinda out of the question ;) |
| Date | 01:14:21, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Back again - and angry. We're moving house in a few days so we only have one tele, which my brother is currently occupying. *grrrrr* |
| Date | 01:14:54, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Waht do you need to do to watch some mindless violence? |
| Date | 01:17:25, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Usually, I log onto the internet and start a post on a right-wing political forum, "I don't think that Bush is steering the Ship of State quite clear of all the shoals..." is the topic. I then watch the flaming commence. |
| Date | 01:18:43, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | MMm. Here's something I just noticed. The NMRP, the PAAL, and the FBP hold a supermajority in the Parliament.... Any addmendments that you two want to do? :D |
| Date | 01:29:56, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Hmmm i don't know... |
| Date | 03:13:09, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | The social-liberal movement (that means we have no actual seats) will oppose this government, which is quite frankly without colour. Why did our president feel that he needed a 236-seat coalition in a 291seat parliament? Why not instead opt for a progressive alternative, perhaps with just the Free Beluzians who are at least not as bad as the PAARP big-government anti-social ultraconservatives. This proposed cabinet proves that the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party is all too willing to betray its leftist (supposedly revolutionary) ideals to gain a broader powerbase. It is time for change. It is time for the SLP. |
| Date | 17:51:39, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2080 |
| Message | Quite simple why the cabinet was designed as it is. I agree with some of the things the PAL says, I agree with some of the things the FBP says, however I don't totally agree with either party on all issues. Thus, it is intended that at least at some points where a majority vote is needed at least one of the parties will agree with me and thus a law will be passed. Make sense? I thought so. Moreover, we've already explained our stance before on these things and we are not prepared to do so again; because frankly we can't be arsed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 236 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 55 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |