Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 03:42:13
Server time: 12:17:46, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): Dioskouros | h48191 | Istev | JVTA | JWBa | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Tax Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2344

Description[?]:

We should not punish those who wish to spend money in our economy. This will be the first step to gradually phasing out all luxury taxes.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:54:54, January 13, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Tax Act
MessageThe rich get off lightly enough as it is already. This proposal not only goes against social justice, but will also give Luthori a gaping budget deficit.

Date01:34:27, January 14, 2007 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Tax Act
MessageWe were put in a deficit by your last spending bill. You care nothing of it apparantly. Less taxes and less spending is the only Christian way.

Date03:47:44, January 14, 2007 CET
FromSpiritualists' National Union
ToDebating the Tax Act
MessageWhat is "Christian" about depriving the poor in order to enrich the wealthy?

Date01:51:07, January 15, 2007 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Tax Act
MessageAlthough we preferred it when all taxation was rationalised at 15% we now feel this tax break is necessary for those already being robbed of over 30% of their income!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 39

no
   

Total Seats: 44

abstain
 

Total Seats: 17


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die together or we are going to learn to live together, and if we are to live together we have to talk." - Eleanor Roosevelt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52