We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2080
Details
Submitted by[?]: Right Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2081
Description[?]:
| Taking into consideration recent elections.Right Party ranking 3rd.USM losing 16 seats.LPU and UB keep exactly same reponsabilities. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the Hobratsis Respublikis Prezidenti (President of the Hobrazian Republic) chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Right Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Right Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the 
Liberal-Progressive Union
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Liberal-Progressive Union
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United Blobs
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal-Progressive Union
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Blobs
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:35:40, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Right Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2080 |
| Message | As the third largest party currently in Hobrazia, we find it unacceptable that the cabinet doesn't reflect political reality in our nation.After all we are here for the people and people have voted and let their choice be known. USM lost 16 seats, they are currently below Christian Socialists. We also would like to know the algorithm/mathematical formula in accordance to which departments are being delegated currently in this nation.In our opinion, the most appropriate would be to divide number of seats won by total number of seats and then multiply by ten.However, as it stands now, we would simply appreciate to be taken into consideration. |
| Date | 01:50:49, July 15, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2080 |
| Message | In order to make a workable government the best position to take is "which parties are closest in political affiliation" not "who has most seats". |
| Date | 15:52:48, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2080 |
| Message | I would agree to this proposal only because my voting record is very similiar to the RP. Taking that into consideration, along with the RP being the third largest party I feel I must agree to this fair proposal. |
| Date | 17:20:58, July 15, 2005 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2080 |
| Message | Makes no difference to me so I'll say yes for the purpose of getting rid of the blank column in the cabinet view - I hope all other parties have set their member names. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 213 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 70 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 60 |
| Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
| Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken |