We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fireworks Bill of 2345
Details
Submitted by[?]: Front de Libèration du Kanjor
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2346
Description[?]:
Fireworks are fireworks, there is no reason why we cant have fireworks available to the general public. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards fireworks.
Old value:: Local governments determine fireworks laws.
Current: Local governments determine fireworks laws.
Proposed: The sale of fireworks is unregulated, anyone may buy them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:58:17, January 18, 2007 CET | From | Socio-Captialist Party | To | Debating the Fireworks Bill of 2345 |
Message | If they are sold unregulated, than citizens can be put at risk with dangerous fireworks. I can just hear some joe walking up to my office with his arm blown off... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 82 | |||
no | Total Seats: 143 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made" - Otto von Bismark |