We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: GM Policy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2082
Description[?]:
| We propose to regulate state policy in this area |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning genetically modified (GM) crops.
Old value:: There is no policy concerning GM crops.
Current: All activities related to production, selling or researching of GM crops are allowed.
Proposed: Production and selling of GM crops is banned. Research is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:34:29, July 19, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the GM Policy Act |
| Message | Why against? |
| Date | 08:04:42, July 20, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the GM Policy Act |
| Message | The Genetically Modified Crops are resupplied by research ... so you understand these things will be forever called "genetically modified crops" ... but will these be "alcaloides" - energetic food for fats/elders - ... or will be "alcalines" - fitness pattern for youngs - or will be "vitamines" - energetic food for vitality or will be "tinctures" - for obscenic seniles ... or will be something else?? There is available enough industry for similar purposes ... and is still no danger for the population if the good things happen and the population is not feeded massively, all together with the same GM foods in the same day! The problem with the research is to go in the good direction ... not trying to exhaust people instead of feeding people ... and if the GM resouces get in hands of the local users then will be no danger to use the provided GM (specially researched for that local needs). If anyone thinks else way it is because of the cultural level of that country population - that can be so poor and people cannot discover if a GM research project is good or if "secondary effects" are at least "not good" if not yet "bad" ... This explains why USA uses GMs and used it a long time while Europe where the poverty is higher than in USA the Governments rejects the research projects on GMs ... BUT in the real world there are still other parameters which are meant to lead the world on the top of a crise if in paradise the GMs producers have no credibility ... for example. Also there are not only GMs producers interested in politics ... inside their rows there are few interested in what they do "politically" ... The highest pleasure for a GM scientist is Classic Music ... I am sure, and also cartoons, sketches, photography etc Aaaand they like fishing!!! But today they are not clever enough to feed a pig ... cause their projects get out from GM crops the most needed combinations of elements, leaving in the fruits just the "structural aspects" on which other new poisoneuos elements can find a place to seat and wait to be eaten by a hungry stomach of a future Genetically Destroyed man from ... from where?? You tell me this! Till the subject will be available for the research of all countries down to the level of regions ... these GM crops will not be a resource for people to eat, but to starve for it ... reading newspapers propaganda! We vote - temporarily (are we a poor country?) - with NO to keep this GM crops banned! |
| Date | 07:35:34, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the GM Policy Act |
| Message | But when you voted NO i doesn't mena that GM would be banned - it just means NO RESTRICTIONS, an anarchy in this area. It doesn't mean banned!!! |
| Date | 19:47:23, July 21, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the GM Policy Act |
| Message | There is no policy toward these GM crops which means that it cannot be "legally" researched or produced - with the exception ... when it's the leader of the state who simply organise himself the research and controls it ... IN SECRET , but not as great secret not to be noticed or not to be OVERSURVEYED by all interested in SURVEILLANCE ... the business can be stopped and guys who work there killed overnight if business is felt going against the ruler? Right?? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 146 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 202 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 147 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo |