We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance for Freedom
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2353
Description[?]:
This new Act would like to make a bigger and better Hobrazia defending our traditions with pride. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National policy regarding the desecration of the national flag.
Old value:: There are no regulations regarding the desecration or use of the national flag.
Current: The national flag may not be used for commercial purposes.
Proposed: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:15:59, January 29, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | We disagree with article 2. Article 1 we may consider if sensible reasons for can be provided. Same with article 3. Question, why are you only pretending to help Hobrazia? |
Date | 21:20:47, January 29, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Power Party | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | I saw that to :-) |
Date | 21:33:16, January 29, 2007 CET | From | Alliance for Freedom | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | I can't see where's the problem with article 2. We think that professionals of law enforcement must wear weapons. The pretend matter is a bad translation from spanish, it would be better, we would like to... |
Date | 23:05:21, January 29, 2007 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | We support article 2, but not the others. |
Date | 03:12:05, January 30, 2007 CET | From | Hobrazian Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | We don't support any of these. |
Date | 09:20:44, January 30, 2007 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | Our current law enforcement are able to collect their weapons from the police station, however they are not permitted to take them home with them. It means that all weapons are always accounted for rather than "well X owns a gun, I want to own a gun to protect me from X" and on, and on until it blows up into everyone owns bigger and bigger guns trying to protect themselves from the imaginary "man". |
Date | 14:54:32, January 30, 2007 CET | From | Capitalizt Party | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | We stand fiercely against 1 and 3. We'll vote down. |
Date | 19:38:52, January 30, 2007 CET | From | Alliance for Freedom | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
Message | Ok we'll present each article separated. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 50 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 350 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: Henceforth, the current system of first and second class stamps, where the rich can pay to have their mail delivered faster than the poor, shall be BANNED. There shall be only one class of mail delivery, and ALL mail shall travel at the SAME speed for EVERYBODY. There can be no class discrimination in the People's Post Office! There must be the SAME class of mail service FOR ALL! ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |