We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Dranish Hosian Democrats[?]
This page contains information about the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Kingdom of Great Bae (Dankuk)
Seats[?] in Senate of Great Bae[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Party Leaders: Luiz Sastre (3455-3470) Francis Indurain (3470-3485) Alejandro Gonzalez (3486-) From the Encylopædia Dranlandia: "The Dranish Hosian Democrats, or the DHD, is a centrist party from Santa Sharika with strong roots in the parts of Dranland which worships the Selucian Patriarchal Church. Founded by Luiz Sastre, a former Selucian(??) priest with a masters degree in theology and a bachelor in philosophy, as an outcry for the lack of morality and constant bickering about left or right in the Dranish political debate. It's opinions on the various political issues is a mix of socially liberal (when it comes to civil rights) and conservative (when it comes to morality and religion) values and a tendency to favor small over big government, but insisting on regulating big business. Adhering to the socio-economic philosophy of Distributism (http://classic.particracy.net/vieworganization.php?organizationid=2991) it favors the formation of small family owned businesses or worker-run cooperatives over traditional capitalist ownership of the means of production while at the same time condemning state ownership of the real economy. DHD also adheres to the principal of subsidiarity, which says that political decision and governmental administration should be as locally devolved as realistically possible. The party also opposes the virtues of free trade, which it sees as exploitive, and prefers fair trade instead while emphasizing that poor nations should receive aid. As it condemns political violence it also condemn military aggression and opposes the military-industrial complex as well as the construction of WMDs. The party lastly also puts great emphasize on the sustainability of the environment and supports measures to support ecological farming. Even though the majority of party members are also members of the Selucian Patriarchal Church, the DHD does not see itself as a religious party per say. Instead the party wants to enforce the core values of the SDC's Social Teaching while maintaining a strict secular opinion of the seperation of church and state. While not advocating a theocracy, the party members are expected to be Hosians, both in their private life and when sitting in the parliament, even though the party charter decrees no such thing. While being primarily a party of Dranianos ethnicity (almost 95% of members), there is no official nationalist line in the party charter, although some party members have from time to time let slip critical remarks about the increasing ethnically diversification of Dranland. These statements are quick to be condemned form the party top, though, so as to not make the DHD look like hypocrits." |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | environmentalist-leaning | high | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | excellent | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
November 3070 | 208,722 | 406,924,929 | 0.05 | +0.05 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
November 3076 | 167,119 | 420,645,269 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
June 3401 | 7,902,416 | 64,919,936 | 12.17 | +12.13 | 31 | 250 | 12.40 | +31 |
June 3405 | 6,246,765 | 65,360,563 | 9.56 | -2.62 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -8 |
June 3409 | 11,251,807 | 60,909,566 | 18.47 | +8.92 | 47 | 250 | 18.80 | +24 |
November 3412 | 12,627,584 | 65,942,725 | 19.15 | +0.68 | 48 | 250 | 19.20 | +1 |
November 3416 | 9,193,439 | 62,810,622 | 14.64 | -4.51 | 38 | 250 | 15.20 | -10 |
November 3420 | 5,876,805 | 65,220,052 | 9.01 | -5.63 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -15 |
July 3458 | 10,328,784 | 53,983,961 | 19.13 | +10.12 | 78 | 400 | 19.50 | +55 |
January 3461 | 11,541,154 | 62,762,102 | 18.39 | -0.74 | 74 | 400 | 18.50 | -4 |
January 3465 | 10,174,822 | 62,141,854 | 16.37 | -2.02 | 66 | 399 | 16.54 | -8 |
January 3469 | 10,734,812 | 57,853,218 | 18.56 | +2.18 | 76 | 399 | 19.05 | +10 |
February 3470 | 11,000,655 | 58,982,941 | 18.65 | +0.10 | 78 | 399 | 19.55 | +2 |
April 3470 | 12,432,442 | 55,593,808 | 22.36 | +3.71 | 94 | 399 | 23.56 | +16 |
April 3472 | 11,595,153 | 62,463,648 | 18.56 | -3.80 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | -19 |
September 3472 | 12,091,913 | 64,359,881 | 18.79 | +0.22 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | +0 |
September 3476 | 5,608,656 | 60,672,261 | 9.24 | -9.54 | 38 | 399 | 9.52 | -37 |
October 3477 | 8,405,745 | 62,338,574 | 13.48 | +4.24 | 54 | 399 | 13.53 | +16 |
April 3480 | 11,183,684 | 62,661,405 | 17.85 | +4.36 | 72 | 399 | 18.05 | +18 |
August 3481 | 10,363,886 | 63,607,832 | 16.29 | -1.55 | 65 | 399 | 16.29 | -7 |
September 3484 | 5,600,142 | 62,242,573 | 9.00 | -7.30 | 36 | 399 | 9.02 | -29 |
September 3488 | 5,803,703 | 58,910,014 | 9.85 | +0.85 | 40 | 399 | 10.03 | +4 |
September 3492 | 5,522,118 | 61,696,775 | 8.95 | -0.90 | 35 | 399 | 8.77 | -5 |
February 3494 | 3,214,587 | 63,601,384 | 5.05 | -3.90 | 19 | 399 | 4.76 | -16 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Central Banking Act | September 4274 | November 4274 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of May 4267 | May 4267 | May 4267 | passed | ||
Ratification of the Sanctioned Security Council Embargo on Kalopia | August 4262 | August 4262 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of March 4262 | March 4262 | June 4262 | passed | ||
Tax Reform | September 4261 | September 4262 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of September 4261 | September 4261 | September 4261 | passed | ||
Economic Fairness Reform | May 4259 | May 4259 | passed | ||
Daily Working Hours Act | May 4259 | May 4259 | passed | ||
Child Labour Act | May 4259 | May 4259 | passed | ||
The Special Weapons Act of 4259 | April 4259 | April 4259 | passed | ||
Democratic Act | February 4259 | February 4259 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of March 4258 | March 4258 | March 4258 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, February 4258 | February 4258 | February 4258 | passed | ||
Religious Schools Act | April 4256 | October 4256 | passed | ||
Cabinet Act | April 4256 | May 4256 | defeated | ||
Separation Act | April 4256 | May 4256 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, October 4254 | October 4254 | October 4254 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, December 4252 | December 4252 | December 4252 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, October 4250 | October 4250 | October 4250 | defeated | ||
OOC:Announcement that NCP will be going inactive Shortly: | July 4249 | January 4352 | defeated |
Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller |