We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Dranish Hosian Democrats[?]
This page contains information about the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Kingdom of Great Bae (Dankuk)
Seats[?] in Senate of Great Bae[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Party Leaders: Luiz Sastre (3455-3470) Francis Indurain (3470-3485) Alejandro Gonzalez (3486-) From the Encylopædia Dranlandia: "The Dranish Hosian Democrats, or the DHD, is a centrist party from Santa Sharika with strong roots in the parts of Dranland which worships the Selucian Patriarchal Church. Founded by Luiz Sastre, a former Selucian(??) priest with a masters degree in theology and a bachelor in philosophy, as an outcry for the lack of morality and constant bickering about left or right in the Dranish political debate. It's opinions on the various political issues is a mix of socially liberal (when it comes to civil rights) and conservative (when it comes to morality and religion) values and a tendency to favor small over big government, but insisting on regulating big business. Adhering to the socio-economic philosophy of Distributism (http://classic.particracy.net/vieworganization.php?organizationid=2991) it favors the formation of small family owned businesses or worker-run cooperatives over traditional capitalist ownership of the means of production while at the same time condemning state ownership of the real economy. DHD also adheres to the principal of subsidiarity, which says that political decision and governmental administration should be as locally devolved as realistically possible. The party also opposes the virtues of free trade, which it sees as exploitive, and prefers fair trade instead while emphasizing that poor nations should receive aid. As it condemns political violence it also condemn military aggression and opposes the military-industrial complex as well as the construction of WMDs. The party lastly also puts great emphasize on the sustainability of the environment and supports measures to support ecological farming. Even though the majority of party members are also members of the Selucian Patriarchal Church, the DHD does not see itself as a religious party per say. Instead the party wants to enforce the core values of the SDC's Social Teaching while maintaining a strict secular opinion of the seperation of church and state. While not advocating a theocracy, the party members are expected to be Hosians, both in their private life and when sitting in the parliament, even though the party charter decrees no such thing. While being primarily a party of Dranianos ethnicity (almost 95% of members), there is no official nationalist line in the party charter, although some party members have from time to time let slip critical remarks about the increasing ethnically diversification of Dranland. These statements are quick to be condemned form the party top, though, so as to not make the DHD look like hypocrits." |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | environmentalist-leaning | high | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | excellent | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
November 3070 | 208,722 | 406,924,929 | 0.05 | +0.05 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
November 3076 | 167,119 | 420,645,269 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
June 3401 | 7,902,416 | 64,919,936 | 12.17 | +12.13 | 31 | 250 | 12.40 | +31 |
June 3405 | 6,246,765 | 65,360,563 | 9.56 | -2.62 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -8 |
June 3409 | 11,251,807 | 60,909,566 | 18.47 | +8.92 | 47 | 250 | 18.80 | +24 |
November 3412 | 12,627,584 | 65,942,725 | 19.15 | +0.68 | 48 | 250 | 19.20 | +1 |
November 3416 | 9,193,439 | 62,810,622 | 14.64 | -4.51 | 38 | 250 | 15.20 | -10 |
November 3420 | 5,876,805 | 65,220,052 | 9.01 | -5.63 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -15 |
July 3458 | 10,328,784 | 53,983,961 | 19.13 | +10.12 | 78 | 400 | 19.50 | +55 |
January 3461 | 11,541,154 | 62,762,102 | 18.39 | -0.74 | 74 | 400 | 18.50 | -4 |
January 3465 | 10,174,822 | 62,141,854 | 16.37 | -2.02 | 66 | 399 | 16.54 | -8 |
January 3469 | 10,734,812 | 57,853,218 | 18.56 | +2.18 | 76 | 399 | 19.05 | +10 |
February 3470 | 11,000,655 | 58,982,941 | 18.65 | +0.10 | 78 | 399 | 19.55 | +2 |
April 3470 | 12,432,442 | 55,593,808 | 22.36 | +3.71 | 94 | 399 | 23.56 | +16 |
April 3472 | 11,595,153 | 62,463,648 | 18.56 | -3.80 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | -19 |
September 3472 | 12,091,913 | 64,359,881 | 18.79 | +0.22 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | +0 |
September 3476 | 5,608,656 | 60,672,261 | 9.24 | -9.54 | 38 | 399 | 9.52 | -37 |
October 3477 | 8,405,745 | 62,338,574 | 13.48 | +4.24 | 54 | 399 | 13.53 | +16 |
April 3480 | 11,183,684 | 62,661,405 | 17.85 | +4.36 | 72 | 399 | 18.05 | +18 |
August 3481 | 10,363,886 | 63,607,832 | 16.29 | -1.55 | 65 | 399 | 16.29 | -7 |
September 3484 | 5,600,142 | 62,242,573 | 9.00 | -7.30 | 36 | 399 | 9.02 | -29 |
September 3488 | 5,803,703 | 58,910,014 | 9.85 | +0.85 | 40 | 399 | 10.03 | +4 |
September 3492 | 5,522,118 | 61,696,775 | 8.95 | -0.90 | 35 | 399 | 8.77 | -5 |
February 3494 | 3,214,587 | 63,601,384 | 5.05 | -3.90 | 19 | 399 | 4.76 | -16 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
National Heritage Protection Bill (NHPB) | June 4185 | September 4185 | passed | ||
Tree Plantation Act | June 4185 | September 4185 | passed | ||
Military Reform Package (MRP-laws) | April 4185 | May 4185 | defeated | ||
Withdrawel of the Kyo Constitution Vote | March 4185 | May 4185 | passed | ||
Anti-Trust Act | January 4185 | October 4186 | defeated | ||
Military Reform Act | January 4185 | July 4186 | defeated | ||
National Database of Citizens | January 4185 | September 4185 | defeated | ||
Uniform Code of Medical Justice | January 4185 | September 4185 | defeated | ||
Smoking Restriction Bill | January 4185 | July 4185 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of January 4185 | January 4185 | January 4185 | passed | ||
Defence Industry Act | December 4184 | May 4185 | defeated | ||
Prostitution Act | December 4184 | May 4185 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, December 4184 | December 4184 | December 4184 | passed | ||
National Health Care Act (NHCA) | August 4184 | May 4190 | defeated | ||
Regulation of Firings Act | August 4184 | July 4185 | defeated | ||
Treaty and Foreign Relation Review | May 4184 | May 4185 | defeated | ||
Religious School Reform | May 4184 | January 4185 | defeated | ||
Abolition of Child Labor Act | May 4184 | January 4185 | defeated | ||
Pollution Restrictions Enforcing Act (PREA) | October 4183 | November 4183 | defeated | ||
Demilitarization of Law Enforcement Act | August 4183 | August 4183 | passed |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "Judge me all you want, just keep the verdict to yourself." - From a Winston advertisement |