We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Dranish Hosian Democrats[?]
This page contains information about the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Federative Kingdom of Dankuk (Dankuk)
Seats[?] in Federal Senate[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Party Leaders: Luiz Sastre (3455-3470) Francis Indurain (3470-3485) Alejandro Gonzalez (3486-) From the Encylopædia Dranlandia: "The Dranish Hosian Democrats, or the DHD, is a centrist party from Santa Sharika with strong roots in the parts of Dranland which worships the Selucian Patriarchal Church. Founded by Luiz Sastre, a former Selucian(??) priest with a masters degree in theology and a bachelor in philosophy, as an outcry for the lack of morality and constant bickering about left or right in the Dranish political debate. It's opinions on the various political issues is a mix of socially liberal (when it comes to civil rights) and conservative (when it comes to morality and religion) values and a tendency to favor small over big government, but insisting on regulating big business. Adhering to the socio-economic philosophy of Distributism (http://classic.particracy.net/vieworganization.php?organizationid=2991) it favors the formation of small family owned businesses or worker-run cooperatives over traditional capitalist ownership of the means of production while at the same time condemning state ownership of the real economy. DHD also adheres to the principal of subsidiarity, which says that political decision and governmental administration should be as locally devolved as realistically possible. The party also opposes the virtues of free trade, which it sees as exploitive, and prefers fair trade instead while emphasizing that poor nations should receive aid. As it condemns political violence it also condemn military aggression and opposes the military-industrial complex as well as the construction of WMDs. The party lastly also puts great emphasize on the sustainability of the environment and supports measures to support ecological farming. Even though the majority of party members are also members of the Selucian Patriarchal Church, the DHD does not see itself as a religious party per say. Instead the party wants to enforce the core values of the SDC's Social Teaching while maintaining a strict secular opinion of the seperation of church and state. While not advocating a theocracy, the party members are expected to be Hosians, both in their private life and when sitting in the parliament, even though the party charter decrees no such thing. While being primarily a party of Dranianos ethnicity (almost 95% of members), there is no official nationalist line in the party charter, although some party members have from time to time let slip critical remarks about the increasing ethnically diversification of Dranland. These statements are quick to be condemned form the party top, though, so as to not make the DHD look like hypocrits." |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | environmentalist-leaning | high | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | high | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | excellent | perfect |
Military | pacifist-leaning | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | excellent | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
November 3070 | 208,722 | 406,924,929 | 0.05 | +0.05 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
November 3076 | 167,119 | 420,645,269 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 0 | 300 | 0.00 | +0 |
June 3401 | 7,902,416 | 64,919,936 | 12.17 | +12.13 | 31 | 250 | 12.40 | +31 |
June 3405 | 6,246,765 | 65,360,563 | 9.56 | -2.62 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -8 |
June 3409 | 11,251,807 | 60,909,566 | 18.47 | +8.92 | 47 | 250 | 18.80 | +24 |
November 3412 | 12,627,584 | 65,942,725 | 19.15 | +0.68 | 48 | 250 | 19.20 | +1 |
November 3416 | 9,193,439 | 62,810,622 | 14.64 | -4.51 | 38 | 250 | 15.20 | -10 |
November 3420 | 5,876,805 | 65,220,052 | 9.01 | -5.63 | 23 | 250 | 9.20 | -15 |
July 3458 | 10,328,784 | 53,983,961 | 19.13 | +10.12 | 78 | 400 | 19.50 | +55 |
January 3461 | 11,541,154 | 62,762,102 | 18.39 | -0.74 | 74 | 400 | 18.50 | -4 |
January 3465 | 10,174,822 | 62,141,854 | 16.37 | -2.02 | 66 | 399 | 16.54 | -8 |
January 3469 | 10,734,812 | 57,853,218 | 18.56 | +2.18 | 76 | 399 | 19.05 | +10 |
February 3470 | 11,000,655 | 58,982,941 | 18.65 | +0.10 | 78 | 399 | 19.55 | +2 |
April 3470 | 12,432,442 | 55,593,808 | 22.36 | +3.71 | 94 | 399 | 23.56 | +16 |
April 3472 | 11,595,153 | 62,463,648 | 18.56 | -3.80 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | -19 |
September 3472 | 12,091,913 | 64,359,881 | 18.79 | +0.22 | 75 | 399 | 18.80 | +0 |
September 3476 | 5,608,656 | 60,672,261 | 9.24 | -9.54 | 38 | 399 | 9.52 | -37 |
October 3477 | 8,405,745 | 62,338,574 | 13.48 | +4.24 | 54 | 399 | 13.53 | +16 |
April 3480 | 11,183,684 | 62,661,405 | 17.85 | +4.36 | 72 | 399 | 18.05 | +18 |
August 3481 | 10,363,886 | 63,607,832 | 16.29 | -1.55 | 65 | 399 | 16.29 | -7 |
September 3484 | 5,600,142 | 62,242,573 | 9.00 | -7.30 | 36 | 399 | 9.02 | -29 |
September 3488 | 5,803,703 | 58,910,014 | 9.85 | +0.85 | 40 | 399 | 10.03 | +4 |
September 3492 | 5,522,118 | 61,696,775 | 8.95 | -0.90 | 35 | 399 | 8.77 | -5 |
February 3494 | 3,214,587 | 63,601,384 | 5.05 | -3.90 | 19 | 399 | 4.76 | -16 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Dranish Hosian Democrats.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
RP Bill: Personal composition and rotation of the 3830-3835 National Council | May 3832 | May 3832 | passed | ||
Marriage Privatization, 3832 | April 3832 | November 3832 | defeated | ||
Traditional Marriage Bill, 3832 | February 3832 | December 3832 | passed | ||
Refugees Bill | December 3831 | May 3832 | defeated | ||
Non-Religious Education Bill | December 3831 | May 3832 | defeated | ||
Income tax proposal of December 3831 | December 3831 | January 3832 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of December 3831 | December 3831 | January 3832 | passed | ||
Defence Supplies Bill, 3831 | August 3831 | February 3832 | passed | ||
Energy Privatisation Bill, 3831 | June 3831 | February 3832 | passed | ||
OOC: Constitutional variables | May 3831 | May 3835 | passed | ||
Organic Dranland, 3831 | April 3831 | November 3831 | defeated | ||
The Right of Self-defence, 3831 | April 3831 | November 3831 | defeated | ||
Animal liberation, 3831 | April 3831 | November 3831 | defeated | ||
Dankuk National Railways, 3831 | April 3831 | August 3831 | defeated | ||
Pensions, 3831 | April 3831 | August 3831 | defeated | ||
Pollution Standards Bill | November 3830 | May 3831 | defeated | ||
Nuclear Power Ban Bill | November 3830 | May 3831 | defeated | ||
Whaling Ban Bill | November 3830 | May 3831 | defeated | ||
Motto Correction Bill | November 3830 | December 3830 | passed | ||
Private Property Protection Act of 3830 | July 3830 | July 3830 | passed |
Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
Random quote: "The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected." - Will Rogers |