We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Social Liberalism for Freedom and Justic[?]
This page contains information about the .
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: none
Nation[?]: United States of Baltusia (Baltusia)
Seats[?] in Congress of the United States[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
September 3306 | 25,311 | 61,031,865 | 0.04 | +0.04 | 0 | 400 | 0.00 | +0 |
September 3310 | 42,927 | 62,099,716 | 0.07 | +0.03 | 0 | 400 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Social Liberalism for Freedom and Justic.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Call for early elections, February 5473 | February 5473 | February 5473 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of February 5473 | February 5473 | debate | |||
Manifesto of the PSD | February 5471 | February 5471 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, May 5470 | May 5470 | May 5470 | defeated | ||
Bill on Abortions | December 5469 | debate | |||
Cabinet Proposal of March 5469 | March 5469 | debate | |||
Freedom Bill | November 5467 | July 5468 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 5467 | November 5467 | November 5467 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of August 5460 (BSP-BWP-P&GA) | August 5460 | August 5460 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, August 5459 | August 5459 | August 5459 | passed | ||
Call for early elections, December 5458 | December 5458 | December 5458 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 5458 | November 5458 | November 5458 | defeated | ||
BWP Socialist Economy Bill | January 5458 | January 5458 | defeated | ||
BWP Ecology Bill | January 5458 | January 5458 | defeated | ||
BWP Nuclear Weapons Act | January 5458 | January 5458 | defeated | ||
BWP Secularism Act | January 5458 | January 5458 | defeated | ||
Market Reforms | January 5456 | January 5456 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, December 5455 | December 5455 | December 5455 | defeated | ||
BWP fair inheritance bill | August 5454 | August 5454 | defeated | ||
BWP Refugees entrance allowance | August 5454 | August 5454 | passed |
Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |