National People's Congress[?]
This page contains information about the National People's Congress.
This party is inactive.
|The legitimate representatives of the Hutorian People.|
Current Triumvirate (3596-present):
General Secretary of the Secretariat: Vincent Harling
Chairwoman of the State Council: Audrey Hull
Chairman of the Local Party Commission: Daniel Freeh
First Presidium of the National People's Congress (3573-3585):
Hans Dietr, General Secretary
Josie Rutherford, Chairwoman of the State Council
Jane Sands, Chairwoman of the Local Party Commission
Second Presidium of the National People's Congress (3585-3596)
Viktor Ananko, General Secretary
Seryozha V. Nikanor, Chairman of the State Council
Vincent Harling, Chairman of the Local Party Commission
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
|Civil Rights||moderate restrictive||high||perfect|
|Foreign Relations||convinced isolationist||moderate||perfect|
|Government Responsibilities||convinced big government||high||perfect|
This party is a member of the following organizations:
|Month||Votes||Total Votes||Votes (%)||Votes (%) (+)||Seats||Total Seats||Seats (%)||Seats (+)|
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
This party has to vote on the following bills:
This is the voting[?] record of the National People's Congress.
|Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37|
|Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)|