We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Sean Murray Party[?]
This page contains information about the Sean Murray Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Sean Murray
Nation[?]: Empire of Ananto and Kalistan (Kalistan)
Seats[?] in National Assembly of Deputies[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
January 2181 | 28,130 | 32,347,584 | 0.09 | +0.09 | 0 | 213 | 0.00 | +0 |
January 2184 | 13,047 | 32,486,351 | 0.04 | -0.05 | 0 | 213 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Sean Murray Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Civil liberties act | November 3655 | November 3655 | passed | ||
Education act | June 3655 | June 3655 | passed | ||
Devolution act III | June 3655 | June 3655 | defeated | ||
Federal Reform Act - DFL ideas for a federal republic | May 3655 | February 3656 | passed | ||
Trade unions act | January 3655 | January 3655 | defeated | ||
Workers' rights act | December 3654 | December 3654 | defeated | ||
Devolution act II | November 3654 | December 3654 | defeated | ||
Devolution act | November 3654 | December 3654 | defeated | ||
Free market act | November 3654 | November 3654 | defeated | ||
Pacific Society act I | November 3654 | November 3654 | defeated | ||
Anti socialism act | June 3654 | June 3654 | passed | ||
Capitalization III | December 3653 | April 3654 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of May 3651 | May 3651 | May 3651 | passed | ||
Capitalization II | May 3648 | May 3649 | passed | ||
Silver Carrot Act | July 3646 | September 3660 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 3645 | November 3645 | November 3645 | passed | ||
Big Government Reduction Act of 3645 | March 3645 | September 3660 | passed | ||
Freedom of Identity Protection Act | March 3645 | March 3645 | passed | ||
Capitalization Act I | November 3644 | November 3645 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of May 3640 | May 3640 | May 3640 | passed |
Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |