We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
New Law Party[?]
This page contains information about the New Law Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Lana Rossi
Nation[?]: Jamahiriat al-Qalb (Kafuristan)
Seats[?] in Majlis-al-Umma (National Assembly)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
February 4149 | 51,709 | 11,743,316 | 0.44 | +0.44 | 0 | 100 | 0.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the New Law Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
The winds of change. | November 2650 | November 2650 | defeated | ||
The Polar Bear Corps | September 2650 | March 2651 | passed | ||
National Anthem | September 2650 | October 2650 | passed | ||
Way too many Jabbas in this here country | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | defeated | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | defeated | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | passed | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | defeated | ||
Power Kafuristan | August 2650 | August 2650 | defeated |
Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |